By understanding what blame gives you and what it costs, you decide how you want to show up in your relationships.
When conflict arises, blame often feels automatic. Our minds quickly search for who is at fault and why the other person should be different. While this reaction is understandable, holding onto blame can quietly undermine the very relationship we hope to improve.
Working on a relationship requires a willingness to examine blame from two directions:
When blame remains active internally, it often fuels resentment, distance, and emotional withdrawal. When blame shows up externally, it can provoke defensiveness, counterattacks, or shutdown. Over time, these patterns tend to intensify conflict rather than resolve it.
This section invites an honest question: If this relationship truly improved, blame would no longer be necessary. Is that what you actually want?
Not everyone is ready or willing to let go of blame. Some people know immediately that they are not. Blame may feel protective, energizing, or justified. Others may believe they want to give it up, but feel conflicted once they look more closely. Still others may feel unsure.
Before trying to change anything, it is important to slow down and make a conscious decision. Letting go of blame is not a moral requirement or a sign of emotional maturity. It is a personal choice. To make this decision thoughtfully, it helps to understand both the costs and the benefits of blaming. Only then can you decide whether change truly makes sense for you.
A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a structured way to explore what you gain and what you lose by continuing to blame. Many people assume blame is entirely harmful, but this assumption can create resistance and confusion. If blame truly had no benefits, it would be easy to let go of. Instead of rushing past this step, take time to explore it with curiosity and honesty.
People often find this part surprisingly difficult. The following questions may help uncover potential benefits:
Possible advantages might include:
There are no right or wrong answers. The goal is honesty, not self-judgment.
Many people find this part easier. Disadvantages may include emotional distance, recurring conflict, exhaustion, hopelessness, or damage to trust and intimacy. Write down whatever feels true for you, even if it feels obvious.
If the list feels short at first, revisit the questions above.
Now divide 100 points between these two voices based on how convincing each one feels to you. For example, 30 points for advantages and 70 for disadvantages, or 60 and 40.
Clicking this will open your device's print menu. Select "Save as PDF" as the destination.
This second part of the Relationship Journal focuses on blame. Another way to view this step is to imagine the relationship fully improved. In that version of the relationship, blame no longer plays a central role. This section helps you decide whether that outcome genuinely aligns with what you want.
The next stage of the Relationship Journal explores the effort required to improve a relationship and whether you are willing to do that work.
This step is not about forcing forgiveness, minimizing pain, or assigning fault differently. It is about clarity, honesty, and choice.
By understanding what blame gives you and what it costs, you place yourself back in the position of deciding how you want to show up in your relationships.
Copyright © 2026 by Richard Lam, LMFT. This handout is intended to enhance your understanding of the Relationship Journal and Blame CBA, which was created by David D. Burns, M.D. (www.feelinggood.com).